ComForCare
Everything below is ComForCare's own required public disclosure, presented neutrally. Chips link to the exact page of the source document.
Revenue is not profit. One statistic per brand, chosen by a published rule set; brands compare only inside the same group.
- FN-COMPARABILITY-GROUP Brands are compared only within the same comparability group (unit basis, revenue definition, cohort maturity). The group label is shown beside every comparison.
- FN-HEADLINE-COHORT The headline figure is one Item 19 statistic chosen per brand by a published, versioned rule set (franchised, unit-level, mature, all eligible units, largest count, latest year, median first); the other disclosed cohorts remain available.
- FN-REV-DEF-VARIES Revenue definitions differ by brand (Gross Sales/Revenue(s)/Receipts/Billings, Net Billings, etc.); see each brand's verbatim definition.
- FN-UNIT-BASIS Reporting unit is the brand's own (business/territory/outlet); composites never mix bases.
From the audited financial statements attached to the FDD — the corporate entity, not its franchisees.
Whose numbers these are: Figures are CFC Holding Company, LLC and Subsidiaries d/b/a Best Life Brands; PARENT, consolidated with the parent's subsidiaries; consolidating Best Life Brands, LLC, ComForCare Franchise Systems, LLC, CarePatrol Franchise Systems, LLC, Blue Moon Franchise Systems, LLC, Boost Home Health, LLC, PROHealth Home Health Services, LLC; and include operations other than franchising this brand.
Audited by RSM US LLP · unmodified opinion · fiscal year ends December 31 · pass through for tax FDD p. 81 ↗
| Line | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $37.31M | $28.42M | $41.82M |
| Royalties collected | $20.31M | $16.1M | $23.36M |
| Operating income | $1.38M | $1.28M | $2.71M |
| Net income | $-7.64M | $-3.07M | $-4.24M |
| Equity | — | $-27.44M | $-66.76M |
- FN-REPORTING-ENTITY Item 21 requires audited statements, but not always the franchisor's own: these figures belong to the entity named beside them, which for some brands is a parent or a combined group and may include businesses other than this brand. Item 21 figures are compared with other Item 21 figures on that basis; the entity and what it consolidates are shown with the number.
- FN-STATEMENT-SET Figures come from one audited statement package (entity, report, fiscal year-end); a later package supersedes the comparative years of an earlier one, and packages for other entities are never blended.
- Director and Secretary · the Franchisor · September 2023 – present
- Chief Financial Officer · Best Life Brands, LLC · September 2023 – present
- Vice President of Finance · Sonova, Inc. · March 2022 – September 2023
- CFO · Alpaca Audiology · October 2019 – March 2022
- In-house counsel · ComForCare Franchise Systems, LLC · inception – present
- In-house counsel · Blue Moon Franchise Systems, LLC · July 2021 – present
- In-house counsel · Boost Franchise Systems, LLC · July 2021 – present
- In-house counsel · CarePatrol Franchise Systems, LLC · January 2019 – present
- Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) · ComForCare · December 2022 – present
- Senior Vice President of Marketing · ComForCare · June 2021 – December 2022
- Director of Resales · Best Life Brands, LLC · February 2020 – present
- Chief Executive Officer (CEO) · Best Life Brands, LLC · March 2020 – present
- Manager/CEO · CFC Holding Company, LLC · March 2020 – present
- Director and Secretary · Snappy Casual Corporation · February 2004 – present
- Member · Snappy Casual Texas, LLC · June 2013 – present
- Minority owner · CFC Holding Company, LLC · January 2017 – present
- Managing Partner · Brookside Consulting · 2001 – present
- Senior advisor · the Riverside Company · 2011 – present
- Brand President · ComForCare · March 1, 2024 – present
- Vice President of Operations · ComForCare · February 2020 – March 1, 2024
- Vice President of Franchise Development · ComForCare · November 2022 – present
- Director of Franchise Development · The Rep'm Group · February 2020 – October 2022
Required public disclosures from ComForCare's own FDD, reproduced neutrally. A disclosure is not a judgment of wrongdoing.
Plaintiff claims that Defendant AYS failed to provide care resulting in Plaintiff being admitted to the hospital.
Status: On or about February 24, 2026, Defendant ComForCare filed a motion for summary judgement requesting that it be removed from the matter.
“Plaintiff claims that Defendant AYS failed to provide care resulting in Plaintiff being admitted to the hospital.”
After ComForCare's Maryland registration expired on December 10, 2008, ComForCare sold three franchises in Maryland.
Status: On April 15, 2010, ComForCare and the Maryland Securities Commissioner, reached an agreement to enter a Consent Order pursuant to which ComForCare agreed to cease and desist from offering or selling franchises in violation of Maryland Franchise Law and agreed to offer rescission to the three Maryland franchises. One franchisee elected to rescind.
“ComForCare agreed to cease and desist from offering or selling franchises in violation of Maryland Franchise Law and agreed to offer rescission to the three Maryland franchises.”
Boost filed suit against Defendant, a franchisee of Boost, for breach of contract for failing to pay fees owed.
Status: As of the time of this disclosure, this matter has not been set for trial.
“Boost filed suit against Defendant, a franchisee of Boost, for breach of contract for failing to pay fees owed.”
CarePatrol filed suit against Defendants for breach of contract, breach of guaranty, breach of the non-compete, and the misappropriation of trade secrets under Arizona law.
Status: On or about February 20, 2026, the parties settled the matter wherein the Defendants were let out of the system by paying CarePatrol $31,500 as well as agreeing to stop any form of competition or use of trade secrets.
“the Defendants were let out of the system by paying CarePatrol $31,500”
ComForCare filed suit against Defendant for breach of contract and failure to pay monies owed.
Status: At the time of this disclosure, the parties are current attempting to settle the matter outside of the courts.
“ComForCare filed suite against Defendant for breach of contract and failure to pay monies owed.”
Plaintiff, a medical staffing agency located in Rochester, NY, filed suit against an independently owned and operated ComForCare Franchised Business located in Rochester, NY. Plaintiff also listed two additional companies unrelated to the matter affiliated with ComForCare.
Status: On or about June 26, 2025, the Court dismissed ComForCare, Best Life Brands, LLC and the Riverside Group from the matter.
“the Court dismissed ComForCare, Best Life Brands, LLC and the Riverside Group from the matter.”
Blue Moon filed suit against the Defendants, former franchisees of Blue Moon for breach of contract and failure to pay monies owed.
Status: At the time of this disclosure, the parties are attempting to settle the matter outside of court.
“Blue Moon filed suit against the Defendants, former franchisees of Blue Moon for breach of contract and failure to pay monies owed.”
ComForCare filed suit against Defendant, a current franchisee of ComForCare, for failing to timely pay fees owed under its Franchise Agreement, failing to provide access to its books and records, and breaching the confidentiality terms of the Franchise Agreement as well as the Confidentiality Agreement.
Status: On or about December 31, 2025, the parties settled the matter.
“On or about December 31, 2025, the parties settled the matter.”
Blue Moon filed suit against the Defendant, a former franchisee of Blue Moon for failure to pay monies owed.
Status: At the time of this disclosure, the case was dismissed without prejudice.
“the case was dismissed without prejudice.”
ComForCare filed suit against Defendant, a current franchisee of ComForCare, for failing to timely pay fees owed under its Franchise Agreement. Defendant filed a counterclaim claiming that ComForCare was in breach of contract and is seeking damages in excess of $75,000.
Status: On or about September 4, 2025, the court granted ComForCare's motion for summary judgment on the 2023 matter and are now waiting for the Court to set a date for the evidentiary hearing to determine ComForCare's damages. On or about December 16, the Court ruled in ComForCare's favor and dismissed Defendant's counterclaim suite on the 2024 matter. Defendant has appealed both rulings. At the time of this disclosure, no date has been set regarding any appeals or additional hearings.
“the court granted ComForCare's motion for summary judgment on the 2023 matter”
Next Day Access filed suit against Defendant, an Ontario, Canada franchisee, for failure to pay monies owed. Next Day is currently demanding $43,066.71 in damages.
Status: As of the time of this disclosure, no trial date has been set.
“Next Day is currently demanding $43,066.71 in damages.”
Plaintiff, who represents the estate of Mr. Deadrick, filed suit against ComForCare Franchise Systems, LLC alleging that former franchisees of ComForCare negligently cared for Mr. Deadrick.
Status: The Court has yet to set a trial date.
“alleging that former franchisees of ComForCare negligently cared for Mr. Deadrick.”
The FTC issued an administrative complaint against CAREPATROL, Inc., the predecessor franchisor to CarePatrol Franchise Systems, LLC, alleging issues with certain wording on CarePatrol's website.
Status: In compliance, CarePatrol modified the wording on its website pursuant to FTC instructions. No consumer was involved nor made any complaint. There was no fine or penalty imposed.
“There was no fine or penalty imposed.”
CarePatrol filed suit against Defendant, who was a former franchisee of CarePatrol, for violating the non-compete and confidentiality provisions of the Franchise Agreement.
Status: On or about January 23, 2025, the parties settled the matter with Defendant agreeing to stop competing against CarePatrol and its franchised system for a period of 12 months.
“Defendant agreeing to stop competing against CarePatrol and its franchised system for a period of 12 months.”
The predecessor franchisor to Next Day Access, LLC consented to the entry of a Consent Order based upon the allegation that it sold two unregistered franchises in violation of Minn. Stat. § 80C.02 (2020).
Status: In that Consent Order, Next Day agreed to pay a civil penalty of $1,000 to the State of Minnesota and $180 in investigative costs. It also agreed to cease and desist from violating any laws, rules or orders related to the responsibilities entrusted to the Commissioner under Minnesota Chapters 45 and 80C.
“Next Day agreed to pay a civil penalty of $1,000 to the State of Minnesota and $180 in investigative costs.”
- initial franchise fee: $59,000 (Standard Offering, single unit); $29,500 (Reduced Initial Fee Offering, single unit)Standard Offering: two units $108,500 ($59,000 + $49,500); three units $153,000 ($59,000 + $49,500 + $44,500); additional units $44,500 each. Reduced Initial Fee Offering: two units $59,000 ($29,500 each); three units $8…
- royalty: Standard Offering. 5% of the Gross Sales with a Minimum Royalty Fee per month; Reduced Initial Fee Offering. 6% to 7% of the Gross Sales with a Minimum Royalty Fee Per Month depending on your month of operation.
- brand fund: National Advertising Fee: 1% of Gross Sales with a Minimum National Advertising Fee per two-week billing period
- technology fee: $100 per month
- local marketing requirement: at least 2% of your Gross Sales on your local marketing efforts on a monthly basis (in addition to required contributions to the National Advertising Fund). Local Marketing Spend listed as 2% of Gross Sales.
You receive the right to operate your Franchised Business in a specific geographic area ("Protected Territory") with a population of between 25,000 and 35,000 people over the age of 65, defined by reference to specified U.S. Postal Service ZIP codes described in Addendum B of the Franchise Agreement. The Protected Territory is protected only to the extent that ComForCare will not locate another franchise or company-owned location within its geography and will not facilitate Approved Services under the Mark "ComForCare Home Care" for clients who live within the Protected Territory.
HomecareHQ builds competitive intelligence for home care executives — talk to us about what you need to see.